Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 (2025) and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from NVIDIA AI and Stockmark. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 ships a 4k-token context window, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct fits 32x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | general production evaluation | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | General | Long context |
| Context window | 4k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | - | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Use Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 when your own prompt tests beat the comparison signals; the local data does not show a decisive standalone advantage yet.
- Stockmark 2 100B Instruct has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Local decision data tags Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-03-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 4k | 128k |
| Parameters | 8B | 100B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Llama 3 Community | Open Weights |
| Openness | Open weights | Open weights |
| Weights | Unknown | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | - |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | - | - |
| Output price | - | - |
| Providers |
Pricing not yet sourced for either model.
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 13B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 vs Marin 8B Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Together AI - Llama 3 8B Lite vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1
Popular comparisons for Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.