Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct
Claude Opus 4.7 (2026) and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Anthropic and AI at Meta. Claude Opus 4.7 ships a 1m-token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct ships a 1m-token context window. On Chatbot Arena, Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 138 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is ~1983% cheaper at $0.24/1M; pay for Claude Opus 4.7 only for coding workflow support.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | multimodal apps, long-context analysis, and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Long context |
| Context window | 1m | 1m |
| Cheapest output | $25/1M tokens | $0.97/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 7 tracked | 2 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | Chatbot Arena leader | 1 rows |
Decision tradeoffs
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads the largest shared benchmark signal on Chatbot Arena by 138 points.
- Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Claude Opus 4.7 uniquely exposes Vision, Reasoning, and Function calling in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Claude Opus 4.7 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $0.97/1M tokens.
- Local decision data tags Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct for Coding, RAG, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Claude Opus 4.7
$10,250
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Anthropic
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct
$435
Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock
Estimated monthly gap: $9,816. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on AWS Bedrock and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is $24.03/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision, Reasoning, and Function calling before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on AWS Bedrock and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is $24.03/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Claude Opus 4.7 adds Vision, Reasoning, and Function calling in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2025-04-05 |
| Context window | 1m | 1m |
| Parameters | — | 400B (17B active) |
| Architecture | decoder only | - |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01 | 2024-08 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/1M tokens | $0.24/1M tokens |
| Output price | $25/1M tokens | $0.97/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chatbot Arena | 1503.0 | 1365.0 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, Chatbot Arena has Claude Opus 4.7 at 1503 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct at 1365, with Claude Opus 4.7 ahead by 138 points. The largest visible gap is 138 points on Chatbot Arena, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Claude Opus 4.7, reasoning mode: Claude Opus 4.7, function calling: Claude Opus 4.7, tool use: Claude Opus 4.7, and code execution: Claude Opus 4.7. Both models share multimodal input and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Claude Opus 4.7 lists $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct lists $0.24/1M input and $0.97/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct lower by about $10.54 per million blended tokens. Availability is 7 providers versus 2, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when coding workflow support and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct when provider fit and lower input-token cost are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1m tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct supports 1m tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is cheaper on tracked token pricing. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/1M input and $25/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct costs $0.24/1M input and $0.97/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct open source?
Claude Opus 4.7 is listed under Proprietary. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Claude Opus 4.7 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct?
Claude Opus 4.7 is available on Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, and OpenRouter. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-05-25. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.