LLM Reference

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct vs Phi-4 Mini Reasoning

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct (2025) and Phi-4 Mini Reasoning (2026) are frontier reasoning models from MistralAI and Microsoft Research. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window, while Phi-4 Mini Reasoning ships a 128k-token context window. On Google-Proof Q&A, Phi-4 Mini Reasoning leads by 8.1 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Phi-4 Mini Reasoning is safer overall; choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when vision-heavy evaluation matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalMistral Large 3 675B InstructPhi-4 Mini Reasoning
Best formultimodal apps and provider-routed productionreasoning-heavy apps
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsLong context
Context window128k128k
Cheapest output$1.50/1M tokens-
Provider routes6 tracked0 tracked
Shared benchmarks1 sharedGoogle-Proof Q&A leader

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when...
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Phi-4 Mini Reasoning when...
  • Phi-4 Mini Reasoning holds a shared-benchmark lead on Google-Proof Q&A, ahead by 8.1 points.
  • Phi-4 Mini Reasoning uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Phi-4 Mini Reasoning for Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct

$775

Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter

Phi-4 Mini Reasoning

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct -> Phi-4 Mini Reasoning
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct and Phi-4 Mini Reasoning; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
  • Phi-4 Mini Reasoning adds Reasoning in local capability data.
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning -> Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Phi-4 Mini Reasoning and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct adds Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-12-012026-05-16
Context window128k128k
Parameters675B3.8B
ArchitectureDecoder Only-
LicenseApache 2.0OSI-approvedMITOSI-approved
OpennessOpen sourceOpen source
WeightsUnknownUnknown
CodeUnknownUnknown
Commercial useCommercial use: permittedCommercial use: permitted
Knowledge cutoff2024-112025-02

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeMistral Large 3 675B InstructPhi-4 Mini Reasoning
Input price$0.50/1M tokens-
Output price$1.50/1M tokens-
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Large 3 675B InstructPhi-4 Mini Reasoning
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Function callingNoNo
Tool useNoNo
Structured outputsYesNo
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkMistral Large 3 675B InstructPhi-4 Mini Reasoning
Google-Proof Q&A43.952.0

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, Google-Proof Q&A has Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct at 43.9 and Phi-4 Mini Reasoning at 52, with Phi-4 Mini Reasoning ahead by 8.1 points. The largest visible gap is 8.1 points on Google-Proof Q&A, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct, multimodal input: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct, reasoning mode: Phi-4 Mini Reasoning, and structured outputs: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has $0.50/1M input tokens and Phi-4 Mini Reasoning has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 6 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Phi-4 Mini Reasoning when reasoning depth are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Phi-4 Mini Reasoning?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct supports 128k tokens, while Phi-4 Mini Reasoning supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Phi-4 Mini Reasoning open source?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is listed under Apache 2.0. Phi-4 Mini Reasoning is listed under MIT. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Phi-4 Mini Reasoning?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Phi-4 Mini Reasoning?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for reasoning mode, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Phi-4 Mini Reasoning?

Phi-4 Mini Reasoning has the clearer documented reasoning mode signal in this comparison. If reasoning mode is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct and Phi-4 Mini Reasoning?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is available on OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, NVIDIA NIM, Mistral AI Studio, and Microsoft Foundry. Phi-4 Mini Reasoning is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.