LLM Reference

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-72B

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct (2025) and Qwen2.5-72B (2025) are compact production models from MistralAI and Alibaba. Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window, while Qwen2.5-72B ships a 128k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct leads by 13.5 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is safer overall; choose Qwen2.5-72B when provider fit matters.

Decision scorecard

Local evidence first
SignalMistral Large 3 675B InstructQwen2.5-72B
Best formultimodal apps and provider-routed productiontool-calling agents
Decision fitCoding, RAG, and AgentsRAG, Agents, and Long context
Context window128k128k
Cheapest output$1.50/1M tokens-
Provider routes5 tracked0 tracked
Shared benchmarksMMLU PRO leader1 rows

Decision tradeoffs

Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when...
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 13.5 points.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct uniquely exposes Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Choose Qwen2.5-72B when...
  • Qwen2.5-72B uniquely exposes Function calling and Tool use in local model data.
  • Local decision data tags Qwen2.5-72B for RAG, Agents, and Long context.

Monthly cost at traffic

Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct

$775

Cheapest tracked route/tier: AWS Bedrock

Qwen2.5-72B

Unavailable

No complete token price in local provider data

Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.

Switch friction

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct -> Qwen2.5-72B
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct and Qwen2.5-72B; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
  • Qwen2.5-72B adds Function calling and Tool use in local capability data.
Qwen2.5-72B -> Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
  • No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Qwen2.5-72B and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
  • Check replacement coverage for Function calling and Tool use before moving production traffic.
  • Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct adds Vision, Multimodal, and Structured outputs in local capability data.

Specs

Specification
Released2025-12-012025-10-10
Context window128k128k
Parameters675B72B
Architecturedecoder only-
LicenseMistral LicenseApache 2.0(OSI)
OpennessOpen weightsOpen source
Commercial useNon-commercial onlyCommercial use allowed
Knowledge cutoff2024-112024-09

Pricing and availability

Pricing attributeMistral Large 3 675B InstructQwen2.5-72B
Input price$0.50/1M tokens-
Output price$1.50/1M tokens-
Providers-

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Large 3 675B InstructQwen2.5-72B
VisionYesNo
MultimodalYesNo
ReasoningNoNo
Function callingNoYes
Tool useNoYes
Structured outputsYesNo
Code executionNoNo
IDE integrationNoNo
Computer useNoNo
Parallel agentsNoNo

Benchmarks

BenchmarkMistral Large 3 675B InstructQwen2.5-72B
MMLU PRO85.572.0

Deep dive

On shared benchmark coverage, MMLU PRO has Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct at 85.5 and Qwen2.5-72B at 72, with Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct ahead by 13.5 points. The largest visible gap is 13.5 points on MMLU PRO, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.

The capability footprint differs most on vision: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct, multimodal input: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct, function calling: Qwen2.5-72B, tool use: Qwen2.5-72B, and structured outputs: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.

Pricing coverage is uneven: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has $0.50/1M input tokens and Qwen2.5-72B has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 5 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.

Choose Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Qwen2.5-72B when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.

FAQ

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Qwen2.5-72B?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct supports 128k tokens, while Qwen2.5-72B supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.

Is Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Qwen2.5-72B open source?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is listed under Mistral License. Qwen2.5-72B is listed under Apache 2.0. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.

Which is better for vision, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Qwen2.5-72B?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for multimodal input, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Qwen2.5-72B?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Which is better for function calling, Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct or Qwen2.5-72B?

Qwen2.5-72B has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.

Where can I run Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct and Qwen2.5-72B?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct is available on AWS Bedrock, NVIDIA NIM, Mistral AI Studio, Microsoft Foundry, and Vercel AI Gateway. Qwen2.5-72B is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.

Continue comparing

Last reviewed: 2026-06-04. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.