Mistral Medium 3 Instruct vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct (2025) and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from MistralAI and Stockmark. Mistral Medium 3 Instruct ships a 128k-token context window, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is safer overall; choose Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and provider-routed production | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Long context and Vision | Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $2/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Medium 3 Instruct for Long context and Vision.
- Local decision data tags Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
$820
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Mistral AI Studio
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-10-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 100B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | MITOSI-approved |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open source |
| Weights | Not released | Unknown |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: permitted |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-03 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.40/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $2/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| JSON / Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Continue comparing
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Codex 1 vs Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 13B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- ELYZA Japanese Llama 2 7B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
- Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
- Together AI - Gemma 3n-e4B vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Popular comparisons for Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
Popular comparisons for Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Last reviewed: 2026-09-08. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.