Mistral Medium 3 Instruct vs Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct (2025) and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct (2025) are compact production models from MistralAI and Stockmark. Mistral Medium 3 Instruct ships a 128k-token context window, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is safer overall; choose Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when provider fit matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and provider-routed production | general production evaluation |
| Decision fit | Long context and Vision | Long context |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $2/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 2 tracked | 1 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Mistral Medium 3 Instruct for Long context and Vision.
- Local decision data tags Stockmark 2 100B Instruct for Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct
$820
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Mistral AI Studio
Stockmark 2 100B Instruct
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on NVIDIA NIM; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Mistral Medium 3 Instruct adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-10-01 | 2025-06-01 |
| Context window | 128k | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 100B |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Open Weights |
| Openness | Proprietary | Open weights |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | - |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-03 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.40/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $2/1M tokens | - |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3 Instruct | Stockmark 2 100B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | No | No |
| Code execution | No | No |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Mistral Medium 3 Instruct and multimodal input: Mistral Medium 3 Instruct. Both models share the core language-model surface, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Mistral Medium 3 Instruct has $0.40/1M input tokens and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 2 tracked routes versus 1. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Mistral Medium 3 Instruct when vision-heavy evaluation and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when provider fit are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3 Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct supports 128k tokens, while Stockmark 2 100B Instruct supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Mistral Medium 3 Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct open source?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is listed under Proprietary. Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is listed under Open Weights. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Mistral Medium 3 Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for multimodal input, Mistral Medium 3 Instruct or Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Mistral Medium 3 Instruct and Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is available on NVIDIA NIM and Mistral AI Studio. Stockmark 2 100B Instruct is available on NVIDIA NIM. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
When should I pick Mistral Medium 3 Instruct over Stockmark 2 100B Instruct?
Mistral Medium 3 Instruct is safer overall; choose Stockmark 2 100B Instruct when provider fit matters. If your workload also depends on vision-heavy evaluation, start with Mistral Medium 3 Instruct; if it depends on provider fit, run the same evaluation with Stockmark 2 100B Instruct.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.