1stTop pick
Researched 49d agoMiniMax-01
- Pick
- Current leader
- Output (from)
- $1.10 / 1M
Best LLM for translation
Last refreshed 2026-07-26. Next refresh: weekly.
Compare multilingual LLMs and dedicated translation models for text, document, and live speech translation. Ranked by context length and general-language benchmarks until translation-specific leaderboard rows land in seed data.
Verdict
Use MiniMax-01 for this task today.
GPT-5.5 is the runner-up: Current leader vs No. 2 on Pick.
2ndShortlist
Researched 58d agoGPT-5.5
- Pick
- No. 2
- Output (from)
- $30.00 / 1M
3rdShortlist
Researched 32d agoGPT-5.6 Sol
- Pick
- No. 3
- Output (from)
- $30.00 / 1M
How we rank
Translation picks are methodology-forward until dedicated translation benchmark rows land in seed data. We surface tagged translation models, Qwen-MT specialists, and long-context chat models teams commonly route for multilingual work.
- Eligibility — Models with translation use-case tags, translation specialization, Qwen-MT family membership, or ≥128K context on general chat-completion routes (excluding embeddings and media-only specialists).
- Primary ranking — Declared context window (wider first), then MMLU when present, then newer release. Realtime speech translation models appear in the table but are labeled separately from text-generation LLMs.
- Benchmark gap — No translation-quality leaderboard is standardized in seed yet — do not treat this page as a definitive translation-quality ranking until WMT or vendor-neutral multilingual rows are sourced.
- Pricing column — Lowest tracked provider input/output where a public rate card exists.
| # | Model | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RWKV-7 Goose 2.9B | — | — | |
| 2 | RWKV-7 Goose 1.5B | — | — | |
| 3 | RWKV-7 Goose 0.4B | — | — | |
| 4 | RWKV-7 Goose 0.1B | — | — | |
| 5 | RWKV-6 Finch 14B | — | — | |
| 6 | RWKV-6 Finch 7B | — | — | |
| 7 | RWKV-6 Finch 3B | — | — | |
| 8 | RWKV-6 Finch 1.6B | — | — | |
| 9 | LTM-2-mini | — | — | |
| 10 | Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E Instruct Vision | $0.08 | $0.22 | |
| 11 | LTM-1 | — | — | |
| 12 | MiniMax-01 Vision | $0.20 | $1.10 | |
| 13 | Gemini 3.5 Pro PreviewReasoningVision | — | — | |
| 14 | Gemini 1.5 Pro 002 | — | — | |
| 15 | Gemini 1.5 Pro Experimental 0827 | — | — | |
| 16 | Gemini 1.5 Pro Experimental 0801 | — | — | |
| 17 | Gemini 1.5 Pro | $1.25 | $5.00 | |
| 18 | GPT-5.5 ReasoningVisionTools | $5.00 | $30.00 | |
| 19 | GPT-5.6 Sol ReasoningVisionTools | $5.00 | $30.00 | |
| 20 | GPT-5.6 Terra ReasoningVisionTools | $2.50 | $15.00 |
Honorable mentions
Next seats in this ranking. Lines below are from each model's stored description in LLMReference seed data—spot-check the model page before relying on a capability claim.
OpenAI's balanced mid-tier GPT-5.6 model. Terra delivers performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at about 2x lower cost, suited for high-volume production workloads such as customer support, document analysis, and internal tooling. Generally available July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the OpenAI API (model ID gpt-5.6-terra). Supports text and image inputs, reasoning, tool use, prompt caching, and Batch API with a 1,050,000-token context window and 128K max output.
See leaderboard
Rank
OpenAI's fast, low-cost GPT-5.6 model. Luna is the affordable tier in the Sol, Terra, and Luna lineup, optimized for latency-sensitive applications such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, and routine automation. Generally available July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the OpenAI API (model ID gpt-5.6-luna). Supports text and image inputs, reasoning, tool use, prompt caching, and Batch API with a 1,050,000-token context window and 128K max output.
See leaderboard
Rank
GPT-5.5 Pro is OpenAI's premium extra-compute deployment of GPT-5.5, released April 23, 2026. It uses the same underlying weights as GPT-5.5 standard with additional parallel test-time compute for harder tasks. Supports text and image inputs, reasoning effort control, tool use, structured outputs, code execution, a 1,050,000-token context window, and 128K max output. Key datapack rows: Terminal-Bench 2.1 78.2%, SWE-bench Pro 58.6%, GPQA Diamond 93.6%, ARC-AGI-2 high effort 83.3%, BrowseComp Pro compute 90.1%, and FrontierMath Tier 4 39.6%. Official pricing is $30/M input, $180/M output, $10/M batch input, and $45/M batch output; native cached input discount is not listed.
See leaderboard
Rank
Compare Top Picks
Side-by-side comparison of the top picks by price, benchmark, and API access.
Browse Other Categories
Best LLMs for Code GenerationBest LLMs for RAGBest AI Agent Models 2026: SWE-bench RankedBest LLMs for ClassificationBest Open Source LLMsBest Multimodal / Vision LLMsBest AI Image Models in 2026Best AI Video Models in 2026Best LLMs for Reasoning & MathBest Small Language Models (SLMs)Best LLMs for Function Calling & Tool UseCheapest LLM APIs You Can Call Right NowBest Long Context LLMsBest Mainstream LLM APIs, RankedBest LLMs for EnterpriseBest Free LLMs You Can Use Right NowBest LLMs for WritingBest LLMs for MarketingBest LLMs for Customer Support
Frequently asked questions
Which LLM is best for translation?
MiniMax-01 is the current LLMReference top pick for translation. The verdict uses the stored category signal Pick: Current leader. Output pricing starts at $1.10 per 1M tokens. Review the linked model and provider pages before production use because availability and pricing can change.
How does MiniMax-01 compare to GPT-5.5 for translation?
MiniMax-01 leads GPT-5.5 in the visible shortlist on Pick: Current leader versus No. 2. The pricing cards show MiniMax-01: output pricing starts at $1.10 per 1m tokens and GPT-5.5: output pricing starts at $30.00 per 1m tokens.
How does LLMReference rank LLMs for translation?
LLMReference ranks LLMs for translation from stored model, benchmark, freshness, and pricing data. The current methodology summary is: Translation picks are methodology-forward until dedicated translation benchmark rows land in seed data. We surface tagged translation models, Qwen-MT specialists, and long-context chat models teams commonly route for multilingual work.
How often is this list updated?
The LLM rankings on this page are updated daily as new benchmark scores, provider availability, and pricing data are tracked. The "as of" date at the top of the page shows the most recent refresh.
How do you decide which models appear in the top 3?
The podium picks are driven by the primary benchmark signal for this category (shown in the Methodology section), filtered to non-deprecated models with confirmed API availability. In ties, we prefer the more recently released model.
Are preview or beta models included?
Preview models appear in the "Watch list" section but are not in the main ranked podium unless the category explicitly allows it (e.g., /best/coding and /best/agents, where preview models often lead benchmarks).
Can I compare two specific models head-to-head?
Yes — use the Compare tool at llmreference.com/compare for a side-by-side breakdown of context window, pricing, benchmarks, and provider availability.
Is the pricing data real-time?
Pricing is tracked from provider documentation and updated regularly. It reflects the best available public data, not live API quotes — always verify before billing.