Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o (08-06)
Gemini 2.5 Pro (2025) and GPT-4o (08-06) (2024) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and OpenAI. Gemini 2.5 Pro ships a 1m-token context window, while GPT-4o (08-06) ships a 128k-token context window. On MMLU PRO, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by 11.5 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Gemini 2.5 Pro fits 8x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and GPT-4o (08-06) for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-4o (08-06) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents | multimodal apps and provider-routed production |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $10/1M tokens | $10/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 4 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | MMLU PRO leader | 2 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini 2.5 Pro holds a shared-benchmark lead on MMLU PRO, ahead by 11.5 points.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and route flexibility.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro uniquely exposes Reasoning and JSON / Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 2.5 Pro for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Local decision data tags GPT-4o (08-06) for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$3,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio <=200K tokens
GPT-4o (08-06)
$4,500
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenAI API
Estimated monthly gap: $1,000. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Cheapest tracked output pricing is tied, so migration risk shifts to quality, latency, and provider packaging.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning and JSON / Tool use before moving production traffic.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Cheapest tracked output pricing is tied, so migration risk shifts to quality, latency, and provider packaging.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro adds Reasoning and JSON / Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2024-08-06 |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 1.76T (8x222B MoE)* |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2023-10 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-4o (08-06) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $2.50/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $10/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-4o (08-06) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| JSON / Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-4o (08-06) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU PRO | 86.2 | 74.7 |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1 | 23.1 |
Continue comparing
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Live API vs GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs o3
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Popular comparisons for Gemini 2.5 Pro
Popular comparisons for GPT-4o (08-06)
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.