Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs GPT-4o (11-20)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools (2026) and GPT-4o (11-20) (2024) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and OpenAI. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools ships a 1m-token context window, while GPT-4o (11-20) ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools fits 8x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and GPT-4o (11-20) for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | GPT-4o (11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps and long-context analysis | multimodal apps |
| Decision fit | RAG, Long context, and Vision | Coding, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $12/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 1 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools uniquely exposes Multimodal and Structured outputs in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools for RAG, Long context, and Vision.
- GPT-4o (11-20) uniquely exposes Code execution in local model data.
- Local decision data tags GPT-4o (11-20) for Coding, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
$4,600
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
GPT-4o (11-20)
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and GPT-4o (11-20); plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Multimodal and Structured outputs before moving production traffic.
- GPT-4o (11-20) adds Code execution in local capability data.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GPT-4o (11-20) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Code execution before moving production traffic.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools adds Multimodal and Structured outputs in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-01-01 | 2024-11-20 |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 1.76T (8x222B MoE)* |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2023-10 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | GPT-4o (11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/1M tokens | - |
| Output price | $12/1M tokens | - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | GPT-4o (11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Tool use | No | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | No | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, structured outputs: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools, and code execution: GPT-4o (11-20). Both models share vision, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has $2/1M input tokens and GPT-4o (11-20) has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 1 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools when long-context analysis, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose GPT-4o (11-20) when coding workflow support are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools supports 1m tokens, while GPT-4o (11-20) supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-4o (11-20) open source?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is listed under Proprietary. GPT-4o (11-20) is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and GPT-4o (11-20) expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for structured outputs, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has the clearer documented structured outputs signal in this comparison. If structured outputs is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools is available on OpenRouter. GPT-4o (11-20) is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Last reviewed: 2026-06-15. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.