Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-4o (11-20)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (2026) and GPT-4o (11-20) (2024) are compact production models from Google DeepMind and OpenAI. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ships a 1m-token context window, while GPT-4o (11-20) ships a 128k-token context window. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads. It focuses on practical selection signals rather than broad model-family marketing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview fits 8x more tokens; pick it for long-context work and GPT-4o (11-20) for tighter calls.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-4o (11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysis | multimodal apps |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, Agents, and Long context |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Cheapest output | $12/1M tokens | - |
| Provider routes | 5 tracked | 0 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 0 shared | 0 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview uniquely exposes Multimodal, Function calling, and Tool use in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Local decision data tags GPT-4o (11-20) for Coding, Agents, and Long context.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
$4,600
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio
GPT-4o (11-20)
Unavailable
No complete token price in local provider data
Cost delta unavailable until both models have sourced input and output token prices.
Switch friction
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o (11-20); plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Check replacement coverage for Multimodal, Function calling, and Tool use before moving production traffic.
- No overlapping tracked provider route is sourced for GPT-4o (11-20) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview; plan for SDK, billing, or endpoint changes.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview adds Multimodal, Function calling, and Tool use in local capability data.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2024-11-20 |
| Context window | 1m | 128k |
| Parameters | — | 1.76T (8x222B MoE)* |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Mixture of Experts |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2023-10 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-4o (11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| - |
| Output price |
| - |
| Providers | - |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-4o (11-20) |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| Tool use | Yes | No |
| Structured outputs | Yes | No |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
No shared benchmark scores are currently available for this pair.
Deep dive
The capability footprint differs most on multimodal input: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, function calling: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, tool use: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and structured outputs: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. Both models share vision and code execution, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
Pricing coverage is uneven: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has $2/1M input tokens and GPT-4o (11-20) has no token price sourced yet. Provider availability is 5 tracked routes versus 0. Treat unknown pricing as an integration gap, then verify the route you will actually call before estimating production spend.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose GPT-4o (11-20) when coding workflow support are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship. This keeps the decision grounded in measurable tradeoffs instead of brand-level assumptions. It also helps separate model capability from provider packaging, which can change cost and latency.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports 1m tokens, while GPT-4o (11-20) supports 128k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4o (11-20) open source?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is listed under Proprietary. GPT-4o (11-20) is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o (11-20) expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Which is better for function calling, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the clearer documented function calling signal in this comparison. If function calling is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o (11-20)?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is available on Google AI Studio, GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, Replicate API, and Vercel AI Gateway. GPT-4o (11-20) is available on the tracked providers still being sourced. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen2-7B-Instruct
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs GPT-4o (11-20)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Kimi K2.6
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Grok 4
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.2 Codex
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.6-Max
Popular comparisons for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Popular comparisons for GPT-4o (11-20)
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.