GLM-5.1 vs Grok 4
GLM-5.1 (2026) and Grok 4 (2025) are frontier-tier reasoning models from Zhipu AI and xAI. GLM-5.1 ships a 200k-token context window, while Grok 4 ships a 256k-token context window. On Google-Proof Q&A, Grok 4 leads by 1.3 pts. On pricing, GLM-5.1 costs $1.05/1M input tokens versus $1.25/1M for the alternative. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
GLM-5.1 is safer overall; choose Grok 4 when coding workflow support matters.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | GLM-5.1 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | reasoning-heavy apps, tool-calling agents, and provider-routed production | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 200k | 256k |
| Cheapest output | $3.50/1M tokens | $2.50/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 5 tracked | 4 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | 3 shared | Google-Proof Q&A leader |
Decision tradeoffs
- GLM-5.1 holds a shared-benchmark lead on AIME 2025, ahead by 3.6 points.
- GLM-5.1 has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags GLM-5.1 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- Grok 4 holds a shared-benchmark lead on Google-Proof Q&A, ahead by 1.3 points.
- Grok 4 has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Grok 4 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $2.50/1M tokens.
- Grok 4 uniquely exposes Vision and Multimodal in local model data.
- Local decision data tags Grok 4 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
GLM-5.1
$1,715
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenRouter
Grok 4
$1,625
Cheapest tracked route/tier: xAI Console
Estimated monthly gap: $90.00. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Grok 4 is $1/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- Grok 4 adds Vision and Multimodal in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter; start route-level A/B tests there.
- GLM-5.1 is $1/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Vision and Multimodal before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-04-07 | 2025-07-09 |
| Context window | 200k | 256k |
| Parameters | 754B total, 40B active | — |
| Architecture | Mixture of Experts | Decoder Only |
| License | MITOSI-approved | Proprietary |
| Openness | Open source | Proprietary |
| Weights | Available | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: permitted | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-11 | - |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | GLM-5.1 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.05/1M tokens | $1.25/1M tokens |
| Output price | $3.50/1M tokens | $2.50/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | GLM-5.1 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Google-Proof Q&A | 86.2 | 87.5 |
| AIME 2025 | 95.3 | 91.7 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.0 | 25.4 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, Google-Proof Q&A has GLM-5.1 at 86.2 and Grok 4 at 87.5, with Grok 4 ahead by 1.3 points; AIME 2025 has GLM-5.1 at 95.3 and Grok 4 at 91.7, with GLM-5.1 ahead by 3.6 points; Humanity's Last Exam has GLM-5.1 at 31 and Grok 4 at 25.4, with GLM-5.1 ahead by 5.6 points. The largest visible gap is 5.6 points on Humanity's Last Exam, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on vision: Grok 4 and multimodal input: Grok 4. Both models share reasoning mode, function calling, tool use, and structured outputs, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, GLM-5.1 lists $1.05/1M input and $3.50/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider, while Grok 4 lists $1.25/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts Grok 4 lower by about $0.16 per million blended tokens. Availability is 5 providers versus 4, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose GLM-5.1 when coding workflow support, lower input-token cost, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose Grok 4 when coding workflow support and larger context windows are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.1 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 supports 256k tokens, while GLM-5.1 supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 is cheaper on tracked token pricing. GLM-5.1 costs $1.05/1M input and $3.50/1M output tokens. Grok 4 costs $1.25/1M input and $2.50/1M output tokens. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is GLM-5.1 or Grok 4 open source?
GLM-5.1 is listed under MIT. Grok 4 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, GLM-5.1 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 has the clearer documented vision signal in this comparison. If vision is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, GLM-5.1 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 has the clearer documented multimodal input signal in this comparison. If multimodal input is mission-critical, validate it against the provider endpoint because model-level support and API-level exposure can differ.
Where can I run GLM-5.1 and Grok 4?
GLM-5.1 is available on Z.ai, OpenRouter, Fireworks AI, Vercel AI Gateway, and Novita AI. Grok 4 is available on Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter, Replicate API, and xAI Console. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
Popular comparisons for GLM-5.1
Popular comparisons for Grok 4
Last reviewed: 2026-07-10. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.