LLM Reference
tau-benchactiveAgentsTool use

tau-bench: τ-bench

Metric: % Task Success (higher is better)Introduced: 2024

Multi-turn tool-use benchmark for agent behavior in realistic retail and airline customer-service tasks, measuring whether models complete tasks through APIs while following policy constraints. High benchmark score alone doesn't make a model the right pick — weigh it against pricing, API availability, and release date.

Models ranked

29

tracked on this benchmark

Score band

95.3 – 61.1

best → lowest tracked

Snapshot trend

-7.71

May 5 → Jun 7 · 13 models

Leaderboard

Tracked models ranked by % Task Success (higher is better).

Compare candidates
#Model variant and provenanceScore
1
Ring-2.6-1T
Version: Tau2-Bench Telecom scenario (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
95.3
2
Mistral Medium 3.5
Version: τ³-Telecom (agentic tool use) (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
91.4
3
ByteDance Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro
Version: τ²-Bench Retail (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
90.4
4
Claude Mythos Preview
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: May 5, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource

Notes: Confidence: high. DAT-3780 weekly best-of refresh: benchlm.ai TAU-bench snapshot lists Claude Mythos Preview at 89.2%.

89.2
5
LFM2.5 8B A1B
Version: τ² Telecom benchmark (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
88.1
6
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
87.5
7
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Version: TAU2-Bench, from official model card (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
86.7
8
Command A+
Version: τ²-Bench Telecom (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
85.0
9
Claude Opus 4.6
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: May 13, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource

Notes: DAT-5460 source reconciliation: benchlm.ai tau-bench snapshot lists Claude Opus 4.6 at 84.8.

84.8
10
GLM-5
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
82.1
11
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Version: TAU2-Bench, from official model card (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
81.2
12
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Version: TAU2-Bench, from official model card (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
79.5
13
Qwen3.5-9B
Version: TAU2-Bench, from official model card (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
79.1
14
Qwen3.5-27B
Version: TAU2-Bench, from official model card (accuracy)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
79.0
15
Grok 4
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
78.9
16
Grok 4.20
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: May 13, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource

Notes: DAT-5460 source reconciliation: benchlm.ai tau-bench snapshot lists Grok 4.20 at 78.9.

78.9
17
GPT-5.4
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
78.3
18
GPT-5.3-Codex
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
77.8
19
Qwen3-Max
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
76.8
20
Qwen3.6-Plus
Version: TAU-bench rank 16 of 37 (pass_rate)Harness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Jun 7, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
76.8
21
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
76.5
22
GPT-5.2
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
75.1
23
Kimi K2.5
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
74.2
24
Gemini 3 Flash
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
71.5
25
Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct
Version: τ-benchHarness: Not recordedEvaluator: Not recordedObserved: Apr 24, 2026Confidence: Not recordedSource
70.2
Showing the top 25 of 29 tracked models. Browse all models.

How to read this benchmark

This benchmark scores models where higher is better. Scores are useful for directional filtering and shortlisting — not for universal quality ranking. Prefer benchmarks closest to your workload, then validate the linked model pages for pricing, context window, and provider availability.

Trust this score when

  • There is a fresh timestamped snapshot (or multiple snapshots) for this benchmark.
  • The model list covers the same version family you can actually deploy today.
  • Top candidates overlap with your required routing and feature requirements.

Be cautious when

  • There is only one benchmark snapshot or the dataset appears stale.
  • The benchmark metric direction is opposite of your decision objective.
  • The score difference between options is narrow and likely within implementation variance.

FAQ

What does the tau-bench benchmark measure?

Multi-turn tool-use benchmark for agent behavior in realistic retail and airline customer-service tasks, measuring whether models complete tasks through APIs while following policy constraints. On this page it lists 29 tracked model variants where higher is better.

Is a higher τ-bench score always better?

For this benchmark, higher is better. A high score helps you shortlist, but confirm pricing, context window, and provider availability on each model page before committing — the top scorer is not always the right pick for your workload or budget.

How current is this τ-bench data?

This benchmark was last reviewed on Apr 26, 2026. The tracked score average moved -7.71 points across the last 3 snapshots.

Related benchmarks

Last reviewed: Apr 26, 2026

Resources