Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs o3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (2026) and o3 (2025) are frontier reasoning models from Google DeepMind and OpenAI. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ships a 1m-token context window, while o3 ships a 200k-token context window. On SWE-bench Verified, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by 8.9 pts. This comparison covers specs, pricing, API access, capabilities, benchmarks, input and output token costs, and production fit for coding and agent workloads.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding; o3 is better when coding workflow support matters more.
Decision scorecard
Local evidence first| Signal | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | multimodal apps, tool-calling agents, and long-context analysis | reasoning-heavy apps, multimodal apps, and tool-calling agents |
| Decision fit | Coding, RAG, and Agents | Coding, RAG, and Agents |
| Context window | 1m | 200k |
| Cheapest output | $12/1M tokens | $8/1M tokens |
| Provider routes | 5 tracked | 3 tracked |
| Shared benchmarks | SWE-bench Verified leader | 8 shared |
Decision tradeoffs
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds a shared-benchmark lead on SWE-bench Verified, ahead by 8.9 points.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the larger context window for long prompts, retrieval packs, or transcript analysis.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has broader tracked provider coverage for fallback and procurement flexibility.
- Local decision data tags Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
- o3 holds a shared-benchmark lead on HumanEval, ahead by 2.7 points.
- o3 has the lower cheapest tracked output price at $8/1M tokens.
- o3 uniquely exposes Reasoning in local model data.
- Local decision data tags o3 for Coding, RAG, and Agents.
Monthly cost at traffic
Estimate token spend from the cheapest tracked input and output route or tier on this page.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
$4,600
Cheapest tracked route/tier: Google AI Studio
o3
$3,600
Cheapest tracked route/tier: OpenAI API
Estimated monthly gap: $1,000. Batch, cache, alternate speed tiers, and negotiated pricing are excluded from this local estimate.
Switch friction
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- o3 is $4/1M tokens lower on cheapest tracked output pricing before cache, batch, or negotiated discounts.
- o3 adds Reasoning in local capability data.
- Provider overlap exists on OpenRouter and Vercel AI Gateway; start route-level A/B tests there.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $4/1M tokens higher on cheapest tracked output pricing, so quality gains need to justify the spend.
- Check replacement coverage for Reasoning before moving production traffic.
Specs
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2025-04-16 |
| Context window | 1m | 200k |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | Decoder Only | Decoder Only |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Openness | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Weights | Not released | Not released |
| Code | Unknown | Unknown |
| Commercial use | Commercial use: conditional | Commercial use: conditional |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | 2024-06 |
Pricing and availability
| Pricing attribute | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price |
| $2/1M tokens |
| Output price |
| $8/1M tokens |
| Providers |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Tool use | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Code execution | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | No | No |
| Computer use | No | No |
| Parallel agents | No | No |
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.6 | 71.7 |
| Google-Proof Q&A | 94.3 | 87.7 |
| AIME 2025 | 95.0 | 88.9 |
| LiveCodeBench | 91.7 | 85.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 51.4 | 20.3 |
| HumanEval | 94.0 | 96.7 |
| Chatbot Arena | 1493.0 | 1412.0 |
| MMMU Pro | 88.2 | 76.4 |
Deep dive
On shared benchmark coverage, SWE-bench Verified has Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 80.6 and o3 at 71.7, with Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ahead by 8.9 points; Google-Proof Q&A has Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 94.3 and o3 at 87.7, with Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ahead by 6.6 points; AIME 2025 has Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 95 and o3 at 88.9, with Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ahead by 6.1 points. The largest visible gap is 8.9 points on SWE-bench Verified, which matters most when that benchmark mirrors your workload. Treat isolated benchmark wins as directional, because provider routing, prompt style, and tool access can move real application results.
The capability footprint differs most on reasoning mode: o3. Both models share vision, multimodal input, function calling, and tool use, so the practical split is not just feature count. Use those differences to decide whether the page is about raw model quality, agentic coding support, multimodal ingestion, or predictable structured API behavior.
For cost, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $2/1M input and $12/1M output; 200,001t+ is $4/1M input and $18/1M output, while o3 lists $2/1M input and $8/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. A 70/30 input-output blend puts o3 lower by about $1.20 per million blended tokens. For tiered rows, this cheapest-track view can understate interactive or fast-lane spend, so compare the tier you will actually use. Availability is 5 providers versus 3, so concentration risk also matters.
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when coding workflow support, larger context windows, and broader provider choice are central to the workload. Choose o3 when coding workflow support are more important. For production, rerun your own prompts through the exact provider, region, and tool stack you plan to ship.
FAQ
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or o3?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports 1m tokens, while o3 supports 200k tokens. That gap matters most for long documents, large codebases, retrieval-heavy agents, and conversations where earlier context must remain visible.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or o3?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists tiered pricing: 0-200,001t is $2/1M input and $12/1M output; 200,001t+ is $4/1M input and $18/1M output. o3 lists $2/1M input and $8/1M output tokens on the cheapest tracked provider. Compare the tier you will actually use; cheap async pricing can overstate savings for interactive workflows. Provider discounts or batch pricing can still change the final bill.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or o3 open source?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is listed under Proprietary. o3 is listed under Proprietary. License labels affect whether you can self-host, redistribute weights, or rely only on hosted APIs, so confirm the upstream license before deployment.
Which is better for vision, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or o3?
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and o3 expose vision. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface. Use this as a quick comparison signal, then confirm the provider-specific limits before committing to production.
Which is better for multimodal input, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or o3?
Both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and o3 expose multimodal input. The better choice depends on benchmark fit, context budget, pricing, and whether your provider route exposes the same capability surface.
Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and o3?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is available on Google AI Studio, GCP Vertex AI, OpenRouter, Replicate API, and Vercel AI Gateway. o3 is available on OpenAI API, OpenRouter, and Vercel AI Gateway. Provider coverage can affect latency, region availability, compliance posture, and fallback options.
Continue comparing
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs o3 Deep Research
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Phi-4 Mini Flash Reasoning
- Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs o3 Deep Research
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs o3
- GPT-5.5 vs o3
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs o3
- Hunyuan Hy3 Preview vs o3
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- o3 vs Tencent Hunyuan Turbo S
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Kimi K2.6
Popular comparisons for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Popular comparisons for o3
Last reviewed: 2026-06-29. Data sourced from public model cards and provider documentation.